[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13158733#comment-13158733
]
Simone Tripodi commented on CHAIN-58:
-------------------------------------
Hi Elijah,
I think that we are on the right path but there are still some limitations,
having a {{Context<String, Object>}}, as we discussed in the ML, wouldn't fit
all the use cases.
I suggest moving on an implementation with generified key/value, having a
{{Context<K, V>}}, would be more adaptable, as suggested also by Niall in the
ML.
WDYT?
> Update Chain Context interface to use K,V generics
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CHAIN-58
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-58
> Project: Commons Chain
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Elijah Zupancic
> Fix For: 2.0
>
> Attachments: chain-58.diff
>
>
> As discussed in the mailing list, I am suggesting that we change the
> definition of Context from:
> {noformat}
> public interface Context extends Map<String, Object> {
> {noformat}
> to:
> {noformat}
> public interface Context<K, V> extends Map<K, V> {
> {noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
