[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13196157#comment-13196157
 ] 

Sebb commented on DAEMON-237:
-----------------------------

The linked Bugzilla issue expects to use ++JvmOptions to update the options 
across invocations of the prunsrv application.

This is not documented as being supported, as far as I can tell, but does (sort 
of) work in 1.0.7.

For example:

prunsrv107 //US//Service --JvmOptions -Da=1 => sets -Da=1
prunsrv107 //US//Service ++JvmOptions -Db=2 => adds -Db=2

However the command-line:

prunsrv107 //US//Service --JvmOptions -Da=1 ++JvmOptions -Db=2 => adds -Da=1 
-Db=2

i.e. the presence of a single ++ option converts the entire line into an 
addition.
This is a bit unexpected.

In the case of 1.0.8, each invocation command-line is treated as a separate 
update of the registry; the existing registry entries don't seem to be taken 
into account at all.

The behaviour of previous versions was more flexible, however it was not 
self-consistent

I suggest the behavior should be as follows for multi-valued registry entries:

1) populate values from registry
2) merge in command-line options:
- if --option is detected, replace current values with cmd-line value(s), i.e. 
reset them.
- if ++option is detected, append cmd-line value(s) to current value(s)
Individual -- and ++ options can have multiple # or , separated values, these 
should be treated as a whole.
3) update registry with result.
                
> ++JvmOptions processed as --JvmOptions
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAEMON-237
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-237
>             Project: Commons Daemon
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Procrun
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.8
>         Environment: XP 64-bit, XP 32-bit, Windows 7 64-bit
>            Reporter: Mark Thomas
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52548 and 
> http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/md3ibbv2w3mxtnb2 for details

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to