[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261899#comment-13261899
]
Diego Rivera commented on JCS-87:
---------------------------------
Sorry must have slipped past. You are, of course, correct.
--
Diego Rivera
> Migrate to build with Maven 3.0
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: JCS-87
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-87
> Project: Commons JCS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: jcs-1.3
> Reporter: Diego Rivera
> Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
> Attachments: pom-maven-3.diff, pom-maven-3.generics.diff, pom.xml
>
> Original Estimate: 72h
> Remaining Estimate: 72h
>
> Evidently, the documentation clearly states that Maven 1.x is the only
> supported mechanism to build JCS. However, this is very dated and it
> wouldn't be a bad idea to update the build process to more modern/current
> standards.
> I've tried to do this, and have run into a few snags wrt tests - I get many
> unit tests failures in what I expect should have been trivial tests:
> Failed tests:
> testIndexedDiskCache4(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskCacheSameRegionConcurrentUnitTest$4):
> expected:<indexedRegion4 data 2200> but was:<null>
>
> testIndexedDiskCache5(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskCacheSameRegionConcurrentUnitTest$5):
> expected:<indexedRegion4 data 0> but was:<null>
>
> testIndexedDiskCache1(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskCacheNoMemoryUnitTest$1):
> expected:<indexedRegion1 data 0> but was:<null>
>
> testIndexedDiskCache3(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskCacheNoMemoryUnitTest$3):
> expected:<indexedRegion3 data 0> but was:<null>
>
> testIndexedDiskCache2(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.indexed.IndexedDiskCacheNoMemoryUnitTest$2):
> expected:<indexedRegion2 data 0> but was:<null>
>
> testBlockDiskCache1(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.block.BlockDiskCacheSameRegionConcurrentUnitTest$1):
> Wrong value for key [0:key] expected:<blockRegion4 data 0-blockRegion4> but
> was:<null>
>
> testBlockDiskCache2(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.block.BlockDiskCacheSameRegionConcurrentUnitTest$2):
> Wrong value for key [1000:key] expected:<blockRegion4 data
> 1000-blockRegion4> but was:<null>
>
> testBlockDiskCache3(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.block.BlockDiskCacheSameRegionConcurrentUnitTest$3):
> Wrong value for key [2000:key] expected:<blockRegion4 data
> 2000-blockRegion4> but was:<null>
>
> testBlockDiskCache4(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.block.BlockDiskCacheSameRegionConcurrentUnitTest$4):
> Wrong value for key [2200:key] expected:<blockRegion4 data
> 2200-blockRegion4> but was:<null>
>
> testExpireInBackground(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.disk.jdbc.JDBCDiskCacheShrinkUnitTest):
> Removed key should be null: 0:key
>
> testSpoolEvent(org.apache.jcs.engine.control.event.SimpleEventHandlingUnitTest):
> The number of ELEMENT_EVENT_SPOOLED_DISK_AVAILABLE events [0] does not equal
> the number expected [20000]
>
> testSpoolNoDiskEvent(org.apache.jcs.engine.control.event.SimpleEventHandlingUnitTest):
> The number of ELEMENT_EVENT_SPOOLED_DISK_NOT_AVAILABLE events [19002] does
> not equal the number expected.
>
> testSpoolNotAllowedEvent(org.apache.jcs.engine.control.event.SimpleEventHandlingUnitTest):
> The number of ELEMENT_EVENT_SPOOLED_NOT_ALLOWED events [0] does not equal
> the number expected.
>
> testSpoolNotAllowedEventOnItem(org.apache.jcs.engine.control.event.SimpleEventHandlingUnitTest):
> The number of ELEMENT_EVENT_SPOOLED_NOT_ALLOWED events [0] does not equal
> the number expected.
>
> testUpdateConfig(org.apache.jcs.engine.control.CompositeCacheDiskUsageUnitTest):
> expected:<1> but was:<0>
> testSystemPropertyUsage(org.apache.jcs.engine.SystemPropertyUsageUnitTest):
> System property value is not reflected expected:<1000> but was:<6789>
> testLoadFromCCF(org.apache.jcs.engine.memory.mru.MRUMemoryCacheUnitTest):
> Cache name should have MRU in it.
>
> testGetStatsThroughHub(org.apache.jcs.engine.memory.mru.MRUMemoryCacheUnitTest):
> Should have 200 puts
>
> testDefaultConfigUndefinedPool(org.apache.jcs.utils.threadpool.ThreadPoolManagerUnitTest):
> expected:<150> but was:<151>
>
> testNonExistentConfigFile(org.apache.jcs.utils.threadpool.ThreadPoolManagerUnitTest):
> expected:<150> but was:<151>
>
> testWaitPolicyConfig(org.apache.jcs.utils.threadpool.ThreadPoolManagerUnitTest):
> Max is wrong expected:<150> but was:<11>
> testNoBoundary(org.apache.jcs.utils.threadpool.ThreadPoolManagerUnitTest):
> Should have a linked queue and not a bounded buffer.
>
> testSystemPropertyInValueDelimeter(org.apache.jcs.access.SystemPropetyUnitTest):
> We should have used the system property for the memory size expected:<1234>
> but was:<6789>
> Tests in error:
>
> test(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.lateral.socket.tcp.LateralTCPFilterRemoveHashCodeUnitTest):
> Socket is null, cannot connect to localhost:1110
>
> testPutLocalPutRemoteGetBusyVerifyRemoved(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.lateral.socket.tcp.LateralTCPIssueRemoveOnPutUnitTest):
> Socket is null, cannot connect to localhost:1110
>
> testStandardPut(org.apache.jcs.auxiliary.lateral.socket.tcp.LateralTCPIssueRemoveOnPutUnitTest):
> Socket is null, cannot connect to localhost:1110
> Clearly something needs to be started to listen on that port (the RMI server,
> maybe?). However, the build documentation makes no mention of this anywhere.
> Migrating to a newer build mechanism may not fix this (and other) issues,
> but it would help revise the build process and perhaps find more elegant and
> future-proof mechanisms to meet these testing requirements.
> If you'd like help implementing this feature, I might be able to provide time
> and effort towards this goal if someone helps me understand the full build
> process top-to-bottom.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
