[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13479161#comment-13479161
 ] 

Dmitry Katsubo commented on LANG-786:
-------------------------------------

I think there is still area for improvement: [line 192 of 
CharSequenceUtils()|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/CharSequenceUtils.java?revision=1199894&view=markup#l192]
 reads

{{TODO: Implement rather than convert to String}}

In my case I have {{CharSequence}} that implements a "lazy" string, and 
{{toString()}} implementation is very expensive plus can potentially cause OOM.

Thus {{CharSequenceUtils.regionMatches()}} should really do char-by-char 
comparison, leaving the optimization to underlying {{CharSequence}} 
implementation.
                
> StringUtils equals() relies on undefined behavior
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-786
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-786
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: lang.*
>    Affects Versions: 3.x
>         Environment: java version "1.7.0_02"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_02-b13)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 22.0-b10, mixed mode)
> Fedora 15 AMD64
>            Reporter: Daniel Trebbien
>              Labels: StringUtils
>             Fix For: 3.2
>
>         Attachments: equals.patch
>
>
> Since the {{java.lang.CharSequence}} class was first introduced in 1.4, the 
> JavaDoc block has contained the following note:
> {quote}
> This interface does not refine the general contracts of the equals and 
> hashCode methods. The result of comparing two objects that implement 
> CharSequence is therefore, in general, undefined. Each object may be 
> implemented by a different class, and there is no guarantee that each class 
> will be capable of testing its instances for equality with those of the other.
> {quote}
> When the signature of the StringUtils equals() method was changed from 
> {{equals(String, String)}} to {{equals(CharSequence, CharSequence)}} in 
> R920543, the implementation still relied on calling 
> CharSequence#equals(Object) even though, in general, the result is undefined.
> One example where {{equals(Object)}} returns {{false}} even though, as 
> CharSequences, two objects represent equal sequences is when one object is an 
> instance of {{javax.lang.model.element.Name}} and the other object is a 
> String.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to