[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13482567#comment-13482567 ]
Gary Gregory edited comment on LANG-769 at 10/23/12 6:52 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------- I can see that there can be a subtle difference between {{NotImplementedException}} and {{UnsupportedOperationException}}, so I am in favor of adding {{NotImplementedException}} back, which could also be named {{UnimplementedException}} was (Author: garydgregory): I can see that there can be a subtle difference between {{NotImplementedException}} and {{UnsupportedOperationException}}, so I am in favor of adding NotImplementedException back, which could also be named {{UnimplementedException }} > Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LANG-769 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769 > Project: Commons Lang > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: lang.exception.* > Reporter: david cogen > Priority: Minor > > Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the > version 2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard > exception classes by providing a more semantically rich description of the > problem." > Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the > library; not just internal use within commons-lang. > I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both > commons-lang and commons-lang3 (but I really don't to do that). It would be > very nice to have these back. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira