[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13482567#comment-13482567
]
Gary Gregory edited comment on LANG-769 at 10/23/12 6:52 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I can see that there can be a subtle difference between
{{NotImplementedException}} and {{UnsupportedOperationException}}, so I am in
favor of adding {{NotImplementedException}} back, which could also be named
{{UnimplementedException}}
was (Author: garydgregory):
I can see that there can be a subtle difference between
{{NotImplementedException}} and {{UnsupportedOperationException}}, so I am in
favor of adding NotImplementedException back, which could also be named
{{UnimplementedException }}
> Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-769
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lang.exception.*
> Reporter: david cogen
> Priority: Minor
>
> Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the
> version 2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard
> exception classes by providing a more semantically rich description of the
> problem."
> Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the
> library; not just internal use within commons-lang.
> I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both
> commons-lang and commons-lang3 (but I really don't to do that). It would be
> very nice to have these back.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
