[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13484887#comment-13484887
]
Radoslav Tsvetkov edited comment on MATH-878 at 10/26/12 12:54 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I added most of the corrections.
* All corrections in the code part (no underscore in the names etc.)
* Comments should look better now. The condensed form of the linked content is
added in the comments. (but the links are left)
For sure there are some more points left to beautify but with the time I guess
they'll be perfected.
was (Author: rtsvet):
I added most corrections.
* All corrections in the code part (no underscore in the names etc.)
* comments should look better now. The condensed form of the linked content is
added in the comments.
For sure there are some more issues left to beautify.
> G-Test (Log-Likelihood ratio - LLR test) in math.stat.inference
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-878
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-878
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 4.0
> Environment: Netbeans
> Reporter: Radoslav Tsvetkov
> Labels: features, test
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: MATH-878_gTest_12102012.patch,
> MATH-878_gTest_15102012.patch, MATH-878_gTest_26102012.patch,
> vcs-diff16294.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> 1. Implementation of G-Test (Log-Likelihood ratio LLR test for independence
> and goodnes-of-fit)
> 2. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-test
> 3. Reasons-Usefulness: G-tests are tests are increasingly being used in
> situations where chi-squared tests were previously recommended.
> The approximation to the theoretical chi-squared distribution for the G-test
> is better than for the Pearson chi-squared tests. In cases where Observed
> >2*Expected for some cell case, the G-test is always better than the
> chi-squared test.
> For testing goodness-of-fit the G-test is infinitely more efficient than the
> chi squared test in the sense of Bahadur, but the two tests are equally
> efficient in the sense of Pitman or in the sense of Hodge and Lehman.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
