[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494054#comment-13494054
 ] 

Gilles commented on MATH-894:
-----------------------------

Removed call to "contract()" in revision 1407485.

As part of this issue I'd also add a new method:
{code}
public int getCapacity() {
  return internalArray.length;
}
{code}
and deprecate the current "getInternalLength()" (which the doc says is there 
only for the unit tests' sake). "getCapacity" is reminiscent of the argument 
passed to one of the "ArrayList" constructors.

I'd also deprecate
{code}
public double[] getInternalValues() {
  return internalArray;
}
{code}
because it breaks encapsulation, making it possible to destroy the internal 
consistency of the object.

Any objection?

                
> Spurious method call in "ResizableDoubleArray" ("o.a.c.m.util")
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-894
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-894
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Gilles
>            Assignee: Gilles
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> Method "addElement" should not call "contract()", as it will almost always 
> make the storage array shrink on the first call since it will be considered 
> "too big" (for just storing one element).
> See discussion about this change in MATH-757.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to