[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13497075#comment-13497075 ]
Luc Maisonobe commented on MATH-894: ------------------------------------ bq. Shall we make the "expansionFactor", "contractionCriteria"[1] and "expansionMode" fields "final" (and hence deprecate the corresponding setters)? Yes, I think so (and I also agree with the name change). > Cleanup of "ResizableDoubleArray" ("o.a.c.m.util") > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MATH-894 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-894 > Project: Commons Math > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 3.0 > Reporter: Gilles > Assignee: Gilles > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 3.1, 4.0 > > > Method "addElement" should not call "contract()", as it will almost always > make the storage array shrink on the first call since it will be considered > "too big" (for just storing one element). > See discussion about this change in MATH-757. > Miscellaneous code modifications are also proposed in order to improve > encapsulation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira