[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13497075#comment-13497075
 ] 

Luc Maisonobe commented on MATH-894:
------------------------------------

bq. Shall we make the "expansionFactor", "contractionCriteria"[1] and 
"expansionMode" fields "final" (and hence deprecate the corresponding setters)?

Yes, I think so (and I also agree with the name change).
                
> Cleanup of "ResizableDoubleArray" ("o.a.c.m.util")
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-894
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-894
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Gilles
>            Assignee: Gilles
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
>
> Method "addElement" should not call "contract()", as it will almost always 
> make the storage array shrink on the first call since it will be considered 
> "too big" (for just storing one element).
> See discussion about this change in MATH-757.
> Miscellaneous code modifications are also proposed in order to improve 
> encapsulation.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to