Tomasz Jedrzejewski created NET-492:
---------------------------------------

             Summary: FTPClient.printWorkingDirectory() incorrectly parses 
certain valid PWD command results
                 Key: NET-492
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-492
             Project: Commons Net
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: FTP
    Affects Versions: 3.1
            Reporter: Tomasz Jedrzejewski
            Priority: Minor


The new implementation of FTPClient.printWorkingDirectory() which tries to 
follow RFC959 is invalid and can return unescaped or invalid path in certain 
circumstances. According to the commentary, the author interpreted the RFC that 
the output is always constructed in the following way:

257<space>"<directory-name>"<space><commentary>
Where any double quotes within the directory name are doubled.

First issue: the RFC does not state that the output for PWD looks exactly like 
this, but that the reply code is the same, as for MKD. Especially, PWD does not 
return any commentary, and VSFTPD server (which I'm trying to talk to) does not 
print out the terminating space, but ends up the output on the last double 
quote. The algorithm uses the following code to detect the end of the quoted 
path:

int end = reply.lastIndexOf("\" ");

If there is no terminating space, the last double quote cannot be found, and as 
a result, the method returns the unescaped directory name:

"/foo"

instead of

/foo

Second issue: the current implementation would not work in case of the 
following directory:

/Foo/Bar" /Joe

PWD command output:

257 "/Foo/Bar"" /Joe"

Value returned by printWorkingDirectory():

/Foo/Bar"

Note to the administrators: the problem has been found in commons-net 3.2 
version, but JIRA claims it is unreleased and does not allow me to choose it.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to