[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13583402#comment-13583402
]
Benedikt Ritter commented on BEANUTILS-410:
-------------------------------------------
Hi Daniel,
would you mind to create a svn patch that contains a JUnit test, that shows
this bug?
TIA!
Benedikt
> No bean defined exception with mapped properties
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEANUTILS-410
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-410
> Project: Commons BeanUtils
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Bean / Property Utils
> Affects Versions: 1.8.3
> Environment: All Operating Systems
> Reporter: DANIEL BRASIL
> Assignee: Benedikt Ritter
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: bug
> Original Estimate: 96h
> Remaining Estimate: 96h
>
> The following code throws an exception. The same code does not throw
> exception at 1.7.0 version.
> The code tries to set property "_new_value" on bean "teste(abc)". It's not
> the correct behavior since the property accessor notation is ".".
> {Code}
> import java.util.HashMap;
> import java.util.Map;
> public class MappedBean {
> public Map<String, String> teste = new HashMap<String, String>();
> public String getTeste(String key) {
> return this.teste.get(key);
> }
> public void setTeste(String key, String value) {
> this.teste.put(key, value);
> }
> }
> {Code}
> {Code}
> MappedBean testeBean = new MappedBean();
> Map<String, String> properties = new HashMap<String, String>();
> properties.put("teste(abc)_new_value", "1234");
> BeanUtils.populate(testeBean, properties);
> {Code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
