[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13584858#comment-13584858
 ] 

Sebb edited comment on DAEMON-280 at 2/23/13 12:13 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------

bq.  ... and decimal 022.

Surely 022 is octal?

The umask needs to disable group-write and other-write, i.e. the mask must have 
bits 022 set.
So the inverted mask must not have either of the 022 bits set.
Anding with 022 will produce 0 iff neither bit is set.
Conversely, if either bit is set, anding with 022 will be non-zero, i.e. true.

Seems to me the code is correct.

Do you have a test that shows the code is incorrect?
                
      was (Author: [email protected]):
    bq.  ... and decimal 022.

Surely 0022 is octal?

The umask needs to disable group-write and other-write, i.e. the mask must have 
bits 022 set.
So the inverted mask must not have either of the 022 bits set.
Anding with 022 will produce 0 iff neither bit is set.
Conversely, if either bit is set, anding with 022 will be non-zero, i.e. true.

Seems to me the code is correct.

Do you have a test that shows the code is incorrect?
                  
> jsvc umask comparison wrong - fix attached
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAEMON-280
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-280
>             Project: Commons Daemon
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Jsvc
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.13
>         Environment: linux x64 ubuntu 12.04
>            Reporter: Imre Fitos
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Current code does a bitwise AND with the supplied umask and decimal 022. 
> This will pass on 022 but fail on most other, proper umasks like 077.
> This is still present in 1.0.14
> patch to fix is here:
> {noformat}
> --- commons-daemon-1.0.13-src-ORIG/src/native/unix/native/jsvc-unix.c 
> 2013-02-06 13:15:58.000000000 -0500
> +++ commons-daemon-1.0.13-src/src/native/unix/native/jsvc-unix.c      
> 2013-02-22 13:19:08.937906780 -0500
> @@ -1230,13 +1230,13 @@
>      /*
>       * umask() uses inverse logic; bits are CLEAR for allowed access.
>       */
> -    if (~args->umask & 0022) {
> -        log_error("NOTICE: jsvc umask of %03o allows "
> +    if ((~(args->umask % 10) & 2) || (~(args->umask / 10) & 2)) {
> +        log_error("NOTICE: jsvc umask of %04d allows "
>                    "write permission to group and/or other", args->umask);
>      }
>      envmask = umask(args->umask);
>      set_output(args->outfile, args->errfile, args->redirectstdin, 
> args->procname);
> -    log_debug("Switching umask back to %03o from %03o", envmask, 
> args->umask);
> +    log_debug("Switching umask back to %04d from %04d", envmask, 
> args->umask);
>      res = run_controller(args, data, uid, gid);
>      if (logger_pid != 0) {
>          kill(logger_pid, SIGTERM);
> {noformat}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to