[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13600880#comment-13600880
 ] 

Sébastien Brisard commented on MATH-738:
----------------------------------------

I don't think these improvements are sufficient (the issue is really with the 
incomplete beta function, while I started with the beta function). The accuracy 
of the incomplete beta function should first be assessed (for example with the 
tools I have provided). In any case, this issue cannot be solved until 4.0, 
since there is a deprecated funtion which cannot be removed before 4.0.

Improving the incomplete beta function is a lot of work. I have provided the 
references in the javadoc (mainly the NSWC FORTRAN library). As I have already 
indicated, I no longer have time to do it myself (I'm sorry I forgot to remove 
myself as an assignee for this ticket). If someone is willing to take over, I'm 
happy to provide some help and references, but I just can't find the time to do 
the job. Hope you will understand.
                
> Incomplete beta function I(x, a, b) is inaccurate for large values of a 
> and/or b
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-738
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-738
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Sébastien Brisard
>              Labels: special-functions
>             Fix For: 3.2, 4.0
>
>
> This was first reported in MATH-718. The result of the current implementation 
> of the incomplete beta function I(x, a, b) is inaccurate when a and/or b are 
> large-ish. 
> I've skimmed through [slatec|http://www.netlib.org/slatec/fnlib/betai.f], 
> GSL, 
> [Boost|http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_38_0/libs/math/doc/sf_and_dist/html/math_toolkit/special/sf_beta/ibeta_function.html]
>  as well as NR. At first sight, neither uses the same method to compute this 
> function. I think [TOMS-708|http://www.netlib.org/toms/708] is probably the 
> best option.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to