[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Neidhart resolved COLLECTIONS-397.
-----------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
BoundedFifoBuffer will be removed in favor of
java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue, see COLLECTIONS-432.
> BoundedFifoBuffer could allow null entries
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COLLECTIONS-397
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-397
> Project: Commons Collections
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> BoundedFifoBuffer could easily allow null entries - it uses an array for
> storage.
> Is there any reason why nulls should not be (optionally) allowed?
> This would mean changing the remove() implementation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
