[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-85?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13702346#comment-13702346
]
Benedikt Ritter commented on CHAIN-85:
--------------------------------------
bq. it is not a factory, but rather a collection/registry/whatever, but
definitively not a factory;
aggreed.
bq. its strong typing is IMHO wrong:
not sure how this will impact the API. I guess I'll have to see this in the code
bq. its definition/interface fits to APIs, not its default implementation, that
belongs to the base package; base implementation is the current "in memory"
one, users can have potentially limitless solutions (based on RDMS, on NoSQL,
...)
agreed. This is what I had in mind. I just structured it wrong in JIRA. First
make it an interface (CHAIN-86) then move the interface to API package.
> Move CatalogFactory to API module
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: CHAIN-85
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-85
> Project: Commons Chain
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: API
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Benedikt Ritter
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> As discussed the CatalogFactory really belongs to the API module
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
