[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13764001#comment-13764001
]
Thomas Neidhart commented on COLLECTIONS-333:
---------------------------------------------
It is still possible, but only when you use the raw version of the class
without generics.
This should probably mentioned in the class javadoc of each of the Transformed*
classes.
> Generic versions of Transformed* classes
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: COLLECTIONS-333
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-333
> Project: Commons Collections
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Bag, Collection, List, Set
> Affects Versions: 3.2
> Environment: OS X
> Reporter: Edwin Tellman
> Priority: Minor
>
> The generic version of Transformer required the input and output types to be
> identical. This seemed to me to reduce the usefulness of transformed
> collections, as transforming one type into another seems like it would be a
> fairly common operation. I'm not sure how to fix this, however, as it also
> doesn't seem feasible to have a generic TransformedCollection with different
> input and output types that implements Collection<E>. Anyway, this patch
> de-generifies TransformedCollection, which also fixes some compilation
> problems. Please disregard this change if you disagree and have a better
> solution.
> Cloned from COLLECTIONS-243, where there is much Transformed* discussion.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
