[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ate Douma resolved SCXML-165.
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

This has now been fixed through SCXML-200: nested parallel now is supported as 
by the specification.

> Warning with nested parallel tags on XML
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SCXML-165
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-165
>             Project: Commons SCXML
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.9
>            Reporter: Ice2scream
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> I get this warning message when I try to load the XML file attached to this 
> JIRA
> WARN SCXMLParser:1716 - Ignoring element <parallel> in namespace 
> "http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml"; at file:../SuperController.xml:20:29 and 
> digester match "scxml/parallel/parallel"
> {code:xml} 
> <scxml xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml"; 
> xmlns:cs="http://commons.apache.org/scxml";
>       version="1.0" initialstate="off">
>       <state id="off">
>               <transition event="wakeup" target="controller" />
>       </state>
>       <parallel id="engine">
>               <state id="controller">
>                       <initial>
>                               <transition target="controller.ready" />
>                       </initial>
>                       <state id="controller.ready">
>                               <transition event="start_controller" 
> target="machine1" />
>                       </state>
>               </state>
>               <parallel id="machines">
>                       <state id="machine1">
>                               <transition event="start_machine2" 
> target="machine2" />
>                       </state>
>                       <state id="machine2">
>                       </state>
>               </parallel>
>       </parallel>
> </scxml>
> {code} 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to