[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13986325#comment-13986325
]
Yoshitaka Kawashima commented on BEANUTILS-463:
-----------------------------------------------
I wrote this article.
http://qiita.com/kawasima/items/670d2591bc8fea19dc1d
Considering CVE-2014-0114, It'd be great if the "class" keyword don't be
regarded as a bean property in DefaultResolver.
As follows:
https://gist.github.com/nakamura-to/11347570
But considering the wide-ranging impact, I think it's okay to build the
alternative resolver like the above one into the commons-beanutils.
> Class loader vulnerability in DefaultResolver
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEANUTILS-463
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-463
> Project: Commons BeanUtils
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Expression Syntax
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0, 1.8.1, 1.8.2, 1.8.3, 1.9.0, 1.9.1
> Reporter: Patrick Trainor
>
> There is no check for the "class" keyword when getting nested properties.
> Please see here (and translate it) for a more detailed explanation:
> http://qiita.com/kawasima/items/670d2591bc8fea19dc1d
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
