[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb updated NET-463:
---------------------
Issue Type: Task (was: Bug)
> Does it make sense for NET classes to be Serializable?
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NET-463
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-463
> Project: Commons Net
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> A few of the NET classes currently implement Serializable.
> However, it's doubtful that serialization would actually work.
> There are no unit tests.
> Also, what is the use-case for it?
> Can we drop the Serializable references?
> The classes that implement Serializable currently are:
> ftp.FTPFile
> ntp.TimeStamp
> util.ListenerList (contains non-serialisable field of type
> CopyOnWriteArrayList)
> ProtocolCommandSupport
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
