[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Thomas resolved BCEL-196.
------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
Each opcode has a dedicated sub-class. Changing the opCode would require
changing the sub-class.
I think I would have written this differently and tried to make opCode final. A
quick look at the code suggests that this would be possible. I could refactor
the code that way but I think there are more useful things I could be doing
than implementing a refactoring that is more about style than it is substance.
> why is Instruction.setOpcode private?
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: BCEL-196
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-196
> Project: Commons BCEL
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Mark Roberts
> Attachments: instruction.diff
>
>
> Am I missing another way to modify an instruction opcode? Deleting and
> recreating does not appear to be a good alternative due to having to deal
> with target pointers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
