[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14526330#comment-14526330
]
Martin Lindgren edited comment on CONFIGURATION-599 at 5/4/15 7:02 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it could berelated to my problem.
We have multiple projects which depends on an internal framework which sets up
common parts of project settings such as the configurations. This internal
framework use the {{MergeCombiner}}. I have solved the problem by adding
functionality to the framework to specify which combiner a specific project
should have.
So if the {{MergeCombiner}} works as expected with the provided example this
issue can be rejected.
Thanks.
was (Author: langen):
Yes it could related to my problem.
We have multiple projects which depends on an internal framework which sets up
common parts of project settings such as the configurations. This internal
framework use the {{MergeCombiner}}. I have solved the problem by adding
functionality to the framework to specify which combiner a specific project
should have.
So if the {{MergeCombiner}} works as expected with the provided example this
issue can be rejected.
Thanks.
> CombinedConfiguration fails to merge correctly when one configuration only
> contains one property
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CONFIGURATION-599
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-599
> Project: Commons Configuration
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.9
> Reporter: Martin Lindgren
> Priority: Critical
>
> When using a CombinedConfiguration it fails to merge properties located in
> both of the configurations if one of the configuration only contains 1
> property.
> {code:title=CombinedConfiguration.java|borderStyle=solid}
> public static void main(String[] args)
> {
> NodeCombiner combiner = new MergeCombiner();
> combiner.addListNode("module");
> CombinedConfiguration configuration = new
> CombinedConfiguration(combiner);
>
> XMLConfiguration xmlConf = new XMLConfiguration();
> xmlConf.addProperty("modules.module", "1");
> xmlConf.addProperty("modules.module", "2");
> xmlConf.addProperty("modules.module", "3");
>
> XMLConfiguration xmlConf2 = new XMLConfiguration();
> xmlConf2.addProperty("modules.module", "4");
> configuration.addConfiguration(xmlConf);
> configuration.addConfiguration(xmlConf2);
>
> //THIS WILL NOT PRINT THE VALUE 4 FROM XMLCONF2
> for(String s : configuration.getStringArray("modules.module"))
> {
> System.out.println(s);
> }
>
> System.out.println();
> //Now add one more additional property
> xmlConf2.addProperty("modules.module", "5");
>
> //NOW IT WILL PRINT BOTH VALUE 4 AND 5 FROM XMLCONF2
> for(String s : configuration.getStringArray("modules.module"))
> {
> System.out.println(s);
> }
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
