[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14703743#comment-14703743
]
Sebb commented on BCEL-248:
---------------------------
Yes, I think we should keep the original class names, and update them with any
fixes from the new classes, and then delete the new classes.
That is much less likely to break BC.
The class-pair StackMap/StackMapTable are basically the same anyway.
StackMapEntry/StackMapTableEntry are not as similar, but as you mention the
latter is a better version of the former.
I've renamed the private fields in the latter to make the changes more obvious
> StackMapEntry should be removed
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: BCEL-248
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-248
> Project: Commons BCEL
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mark Roberts
>
> StackMapTableEntry is a much better implementation of the same object as
> StackMapEntry. The later should be removed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
