[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15168884#comment-15168884
]
Dmitri Blinov commented on JEXL-190:
------------------------------------
It has turned out that the problem is reproduced if I try to initialize
JEXLEngine with functions without a namespace in a way like this
{code}
functions = new HashMap<String, Object>();
// Register default function namespaces
functions.put(null, new DefaultFunctions(this));
...
// Jexl Setup
boolean verboseScripting = true;
boolean strict = false;
JexlBuilder jb = new JexlBuilder();
jb.silent(!verboseScripting);
jb.strict(strict);
jb.namespaces(functions);
...
{code}
If I comment out the line {code} // functions.put(null, new
DefaultFunctions(this)); {code} everything works as expected. Now I wonder if
it's correct to register functions with null namespace ?
> function name within script is not resolved
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JEXL-190
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-190
> Project: Commons JEXL
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Dmitri Blinov
> Assignee: Henri Biestro
>
> {code}
> z = function(x) { return x + 1}; return z(1)
> {code} returns error unsolvable function/method 'z' while
> {code}
> var z = function(x) { return x + 1}; return z(1)
> {code} returns 2
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
