[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Henri Biestro resolved JEXL-194.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0.1
Added overload handling of forEach method operator in JexlArithmetic;
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/JexlOperator.java
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/internal/Interpreter.java
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/internal/Operators.java
src/test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/SynchronizedArithmetic.java
src/test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/SynchronizedContext.java
src/test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl3/SynchronizedOverloadsTest.java
Committed revision 1747591.
> synchronize on iterableValue in foreach statement
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JEXL-194
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-194
> Project: Commons JEXL
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Dmitri Blinov
> Assignee: Henri Biestro
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0.1
>
>
> Since it is a requirement to synchronize on simple Collections and
> synchronized Collections while iterating over them and since jexl has no
> instrument to control synchronization in script, I think its reasonable to
> implement synchronization in jexl itself on iterableValue. In case of
> concurrent collections it will possibly block other threads only if they are
> synchronizing on those collections themselves, which will be complementary to
> required synchronization in jexl.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
