[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15600056#comment-15600056
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1034:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user PascalSchumacher opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/202

    LANG-1034: Recursive and reflective EqualsBuilder

    patch by yathos UG

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/PascalSchumacher/commons-lang 
recursiveAndReflectiveEqualsBuilder

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/202.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #202
    
----
commit b6eee76036d4e44f89f029aa3d45b6842598e69b
Author: pascalschumacher <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-10-23T17:56:28Z

    LANG-1034: Recursive and reflective EqualsBuilder
    
    patch by yathos UG

----


> Recursive and reflective equals builder
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-1034
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1034
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: lang.builder.*
>            Reporter: Duncan Jones
>            Assignee: Duncan Jones
>             Fix For: Review Patch
>
>         Attachments: LANG-1034.1.patch
>
>
> The current implementation of {{EqualsBuilder.reflectionEquals()}} uses 
> object equality to test reference fields found in the class. It may be 
> helpful to offer a method that recursively builds {{.equals()}} methods for 
> each field and uses that to perform the comparison.
> This functionality could be further extended by accepting a list of classes 
> to include/exclude. Classes that are excluded would use the normal object 
> equality.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to