[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16062037#comment-16062037
 ] 

Stefan Bodewig commented on COMPRESS-400:
-----------------------------------------

Let me retry, as I really like your changes and would like to merge them. I 
don't think we need {{addXattr}} and {{getXattr}} - and thus {{XATTR_PREFIX}}. 
They'd only ever be used by people who should know what they are doing and 
could add the prefixes themselves. They are convenience methods for an 
extremely small subset of our users that would be trivial to write outside of 
our code base.

I'd be happy to merge your change without these two methods.

> It should be possible for users to create and access extra PAX headers to tar 
> archives 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COMPRESS-400
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-400
>             Project: Commons Compress
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Archivers
>            Reporter: Simon Spero
>            Priority: Minor
>
> It is very useful to be able to add extra PAX headers to tar entries.  For 
> example, a tar file containing maven artifacts could have extra headers 
> carrying the groupid, artifactid, version, classifier, etc.  
> If the appropriate prefixes are used, these headers can be extracted to posix 
> extended attributes by gnu and bsdtar.
> This change requires adding a map to TarArchiveEntry to carry the extra 
> headers, plus modifications to the TarArchive*Stream to save unrecognized 
> headers when reading, and to add any extra headers when writing. 
> I have created a prototype implementation, but have not merged it into my 
> fork of the project.  I don't have full tests written, because I was using 
> gnutar as an oracle.
>  I have also ignored the issue of writing values to standard headers like 
> size, though since the PAX specification states that doing things like 
> setting size=100 (if the real size is not in fact 100) is undefined, so I'm 
> technically in compliance.  The temptation is  to do what was asked, then on 
> close pop up a "Were you sure?" dialog, but that's mean.  I guess I could use 
> this to set the appropriate entry fields if doing so makes sense, but the 
> easiest approach  is to block setting any headers that would be consumed by 
> the tar implementation when reading. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to