[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEXT-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16078054#comment-16078054
]
Rob Tompkins commented on TEXT-97:
----------------------------------
Based on what [~erans] said above, it almost makes sense to have
{code:java}
addRangeToAlphabet(char rangeMin, char rangeMax)
{code}
to avoid the need for input validation. I also quite like the
{code:java}
RandomStringGenerator randAlphaNum = new RandomStringGenerator.Builder()
.selectFrom(lowerCaseAscii(),
upperCaseAscii(),
decimalDigits()).build();
{code}
idea. Is there an argument against:
{code:java}
RandomStringGenerator randAlphaNum = new RandomStringGenerator.Builder()
. addRangeToAlphabet('a','z')
. addRangeToAlphabet('A','Z')
. addRangeToAlphabet('0','9').build();
{code}
aside from the single line bit?
> RandomStringGenerator should be able to pass multiple ranges to .withinRange()
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEXT-97
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEXT-97
> Project: Commons Text
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Amey Jadiye
> Fix For: 1.2
>
>
> Users should have ability to pass multiple ranges to generate desired output.
> Ex. For
> *.randomNumeric()*
> {code}
> char [][] ranges = {{'0','9'}};
> RandomStringGenerator generator = new
> RandomStringGenerator.Builder().withinRange(ranges).build();
> {code}
> *.randomAlphabetic()*
> {code}
> char [][] ranges = {{'A','Z'}}; // or {{'A','Z'},{'a','z'}}
> RandomStringGenerator generator = new
> RandomStringGenerator.Builder().withinRange(ranges).build();
> {code}
> *.randomAlphanumeric()*
> {code}
> char [][] ranges = {{'0','9'},{'A','Z'},{'a','b'}};
> RandomStringGenerator generator = new
> RandomStringGenerator.Builder().withinRange(ranges).build();
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
