[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16351143#comment-16351143
 ] 

Gary Gregory commented on COLLECTIONS-673:
------------------------------------------

Thank for your report [~jmark].

We welcome patches, with unit tests of course! :)

> ListUtils.partition potential integer overflow
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COLLECTIONS-673
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-673
>             Project: Commons Collections
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: List
>    Affects Versions: 4.1
>            Reporter: John Mark
>            Priority: Major
>
> When calling {{ListUtils.partition()}} with a large size and large list, it 
> is possible that an integer overflow will occur in the {{size()}} method that 
> causes incorrect behavior. This will occur when using a size that, when added 
> to list.size() will be larger than {{Integer.MAX_VALUE}}
> Current version of Guava's {{Lists.partition()}} handle this correctly, so 
> perhaps the code for {{ListUtils.partition()}} needs to be updated based on 
> the latest Guava code.
> A simple illustration of this:
> {code}
> List<String> aList = Arrays.asList("1", "2", "3", "4", "5");
> List<List<String>> partitioned = ListUtils.partition(aList, 
> Integer.MAX_VALUE);
> System.out.println("Number of partitions: " + partitioned.size());
> for(List<String> l : partitioned)  {
>      System.out.println(l);
> }
> {code}
> The above code works correctly when using Guava's {{Lists.partition()}} 
> instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to