[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16387858#comment-16387858
]
Gilles commented on COMMONSRDF-75:
----------------------------------
I'm just trying to not waste anyone's time on questions that could perhaps be
answered by people not looking here...
Unless we consider this "Commons RDF"-only (and from the few comments up to
now, it seems not), this is not the best place to gather all the relevant
information for the proposal.
See posts on the "dev" ML, about making "Commons RNG" (JPMS) modules, where
a.o. things, Gary's advice was to *not* provide multi-release JARs; I think
that's a pretty important data point. ;)
> Migrate to Java 9 using JPMS
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: COMMONSRDF-75
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSRDF-75
> Project: Apache Commons RDF
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: api, build, jena, jsonld-java, parser, rdf4j, simple
> Reporter: Kamila Molina
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: gsoc2018, library
>
> Add module-info.java for each module. JPMS allows to create libraries with
> strong encapsulation; however, this migration will bring with many effects
> that can potentially break code. For example, JDK 9 doesn't gives access for
> internal types such as {{sun.misc.BASE64Encoder.}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
