[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-72?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Barnhill updated NUMBERS-72:
---------------------------------
Description:
Now that the Complex constructor is private, arrays of Complex objects break.
So, it is no longer backwards-compatible with most of my Complex code.
If we are not concerned about backwards compatibility with commons-math, I
propose we add a method in Complex or ComplexUtils taking array dimensions,
e.g. "complexArray(5, 4, 3)" returning the result of the previous "new
Complex[5][4][3]" (though slightly better as the Complex objects can all be
initialized to 0,0).
EDIT: it will have to be in the Complex class if the constructor is private. So
I will add this.
was:
Now that the Complex constructor is private, arrays of Complex objects break.
So, it is no longer backwards-compatible with most of my Complex code.
If we are not concerned about backwards compatibility with commons-math, I
propose we add a method in Complex or ComplexUtils taking array dimensions,
e.g. "complexArray(5, 4, 3)" returning the result of the previous "new
Complex[5][4][3]" (though slightly better as the Complex objects can all be
initialized to 0,0).
> Initialization of Complex arrays
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: NUMBERS-72
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-72
> Project: Commons Numbers
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Eric Barnhill
> Priority: Minor
>
> Now that the Complex constructor is private, arrays of Complex objects break.
> So, it is no longer backwards-compatible with most of my Complex code.
> If we are not concerned about backwards compatibility with commons-math, I
> propose we add a method in Complex or ComplexUtils taking array dimensions,
> e.g. "complexArray(5, 4, 3)" returning the result of the previous "new
> Complex[5][4][3]" (though slightly better as the Complex objects can all be
> initialized to 0,0).
>
> EDIT: it will have to be in the Complex class if the constructor is private.
> So I will add this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
