[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16640486#comment-16640486
 ] 

Gilles commented on RNG-57:
---------------------------

There are too many things in PR 11: it should only contain the additions to 
{{LongProvider}} and {{IntProvider}} and their associated unit tests.

For the failures, I think that the least problematic change would be to select 
another seed.  We can always revisit later the common infrastructure of the 
unit tests.

> CachedUniformRandomProvider for nextBoolean() and nextInt()
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RNG-57
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-57
>             Project: Commons RNG
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sampling
>    Affects Versions: 1.2
>            Reporter: Alex D Herbert
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: performance
>
> Implement a wrapper around a {{UniformRandomProvider}} that can cache the 
> underlying source of random bytes for use in the methods {{nextBoolean()}} 
> and {{nextInt()}} (in the case of {{LongProvider}}). E.g.
> {code:java}
> LongProvider provider = RandomSource.create(RandomSource.SPLIT_MIX_64);
> CachedLongProvider rng = new CachedLongProvider(provider);
> // Uses cached nextLong() 64 times
> rng.nextBoolean();
> // Uses cached nextLong() twice
> rng.nextInt();
> IntProvider provider = RandomSource.create(RandomSource.KISS);
> CachedIntProvider rng2 = new CachedIntProvider(provider);
> // Uses cached nextInt() 32 times
> rng2.nextBoolean();
> // This could be wrapped by a factory method:
> UniformRandomProvider rng = CachedUniformRandomProviderFactory.wrap(
>         // Any supported source: IntProvider or LongProvider
>         RandomSource.create(RandomSource...));
> {code}
> The implementation should be speed tested to determine the benefit for 
> {{nextBoolean()}} and if {{nextInt()}} can be improved for {{LongProviders}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to