[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16689500#comment-16689500
]
Gilles commented on RNG-60:
---------------------------
bq. This is so ugly. But it allows better control over the probability of
failures
Indeed, the trade-off I was talking about.
bq. JUnit 5
I haven't had a look at it yet.
bq. the change for RNG-57 now passes fine.
Well, the seeds are random now, and there are "flakes", as expected. :-)
> Random seeds in "ProvidersList" (unit tests)
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: RNG-60
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-60
> Project: Commons RNG
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.1
> Reporter: Gilles
> Assignee: Gilles
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: unit-test
> Fix For: 1.2
>
>
> Unit tests for the RNG "providers" should demonstrate some robustness wrt the
> seed passed to them.
> The currently fixed seeds will be replaced by values obtained from a JDK's
> {{SecureRandom}} instance.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
