[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Alex D Herbert resolved RNG-79.
-------------------------------
       Resolution: Implemented
    Fix Version/s: 1.3

Benchmark added to master.

> Benchmark methods for producing nextDouble
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RNG-79
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-79
>             Project: Commons RNG
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Alex D Herbert
>            Assignee: Alex D Herbert
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.3
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Benchmark the speed of methods for producing a {{double}} from a {{long}}:
> {code:java}
> long v;
> double d1 = Double.longBitsToDouble(0x3FFL << 52 | v >>> 12) - 1.0;
> double d2 = (v >>> 12) * 0x1.0p-52d; // 1.0 / (1L << 52);
> double d3 = (v >>> 11) * 0x1.0p-53d; // 1.0 / (1L << 53);
> {code}
> Method d1 and d2 are both currently employed in the {{NumberFactory}} 
> (makeDouble(int,int) and makeDouble(long)). However they suffer from 
> producing a double whose least significant bit is always 0, i.e. they produce 
> half of all possible double values from 0-1. This is discussed in the 
> reference for the [XorShiRo generators|http://xoshiro.di.unimi.it/].
> This task will benchmark the methods using JMH. A switch to method d3 may be 
> appropriate as it generates more values. This is the method employed in JDK 
> 1.7 ThreadLocalRandom.
> A similar analysis can be made for producing a float:
> {code:java}
> int v;
> double f1 = Float.intBitsToFloat(0x7f << 23 | v >>> 9) - 1.0f;
> double f2 = (v >>> 9) * 0x1.0p-23f; // 1.0f / (1 << 23);
> double f3 = (v >>> 8) * 0x1.0p-24f; // 1.0f / (1 << 24)
> {code}
> Method f2 is currently used in the {{NumberFactory}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to