[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16910022#comment-16910022
 ] 

Melloware commented on BEANUTILS-520:
-------------------------------------

Those are good questions!

1. Looks like Commons Collections would not be insignificant changes to remove. 
At least from what I can see?

2. I don't see any @deprecated in the code to remove.

3. As for changing interfaces that I don't think I am qualified to answer.

to me this library has been around for 15+ years and is rock solid.  a 2.0 
release would get it up to Java 8 and in line with the rest of Apache releases.

> BeanUtils2 mitigate CVE-2014-0114
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEANUTILS-520
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-520
>             Project: Commons BeanUtils
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Bean / Property Utils
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.3
>            Reporter: Melloware
>            Assignee: Rob Tompkins
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: security
>             Fix For: 1.9.4, 2.0.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0114
> Due to the above CVE in 1.9.2 they added a Suppression but it is still being 
> marked as a security risk through most major checks from OWASP and Sonatype 
> IQ.
> "commons-beanutils added a SuppressPropertiesBeanIntrospector which includes 
> a specialized instance of itself as the SUPPRESS_CLASS constant beginning in 
> version 1.9.2 that specifically suppresses the class property. +However, this 
> fix is not enabled by default.+"
> For BeanUtils2 why not make this the default and have people "enable" it if 
> it they want to get the feature.
> Thanks for your consideration.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to