[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16945187#comment-16945187
]
Phil Steitz commented on POOL-321:
----------------------------------
The problem with this is that the parameter needs to be passed to the factory
and the pool would have to know about the signature or use some type-weak
method of passing parameters via JSON or somesuch. How about adding an
addObject(T) that takes an instance of the class of objects under management?
Client code can then extend the factory to create instances with whatever
parameters are desired and then use this method to get them added to the pool.
> ObjectPool.addObject limiting us to add an object with parameter
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: POOL-321
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-321
> Project: Commons Pool
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.4
> Reporter: Ugur Bayram
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7.1
>
>
> In current implementation we are not able to add an object with parameter to
> the pool. addObject does not take any parameter
> Consider of a user pool where the content of each user might differ. In such
> cases, current implementation have limitation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
