[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16957873#comment-16957873
 ] 

Woonsan Ko commented on VFS-687:
--------------------------------

Hi,

I've submitted a PR - https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/74 - to add 
http5/http5s providers which uses HttpClient v5, simply using "classic" API 
usages. I assume this with "classic" usage is fine for now, as initial addition 
at least, as it wouldn't cause any incompatible or brand new VFS APIs.
Please take reviews.

Thanks,

Woonsan

> HttpClient 5 based FileSystemProvider
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: VFS-687
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-687
>             Project: Commons VFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Woonsan Ko
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As of VFS-360, we have two different http client based file system providers: 
> "http3(s)" vs. "http4(s)".
> Since HttpClient 5 is coming out in the near future (HttpClient 5 Beta 2 is 
> already available), it would be nice if we have "http5(s)" file system 
> provider as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to