[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16957873#comment-16957873
]
Woonsan Ko commented on VFS-687:
--------------------------------
Hi,
I've submitted a PR - https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/74 - to add
http5/http5s providers which uses HttpClient v5, simply using "classic" API
usages. I assume this with "classic" usage is fine for now, as initial addition
at least, as it wouldn't cause any incompatible or brand new VFS APIs.
Please take reviews.
Thanks,
Woonsan
> HttpClient 5 based FileSystemProvider
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: VFS-687
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-687
> Project: Commons VFS
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Woonsan Ko
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As of VFS-360, we have two different http client based file system providers:
> "http3(s)" vs. "http4(s)".
> Since HttpClient 5 is coming out in the near future (HttpClient 5 Beta 2 is
> already available), it would be nice if we have "http5(s)" file system
> provider as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)