[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16962018#comment-16962018
 ] 

Gary D. Gregory commented on CONFIGURATION-766:
-----------------------------------------------

I:
 * Added a test to document current behavior.
 * Added an ignored test from this ticket.

Please rebase your PR on master.

The proposed change will break behavioral compatibility of course. I am 
wondering if we should:
 * Change the behavior per the proposal, or
 * Provide the new behavior via a new API (like {{toBigDecimalFoo}} where 
{{Foo}} is not meaningful post fix.

I'd also like feedback from [~chtompki].

 

> BigDecimal(double) should not be used
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CONFIGURATION-766
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-766
>             Project: Commons Configuration
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: A single occurrence in file PropertyConverter.java, line 
> 393:
> {code:java}
> return new BigDecimal(n.doubleValue());
> {code}
>            Reporter: Haris Adzemovic
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Static analysis with SonarQube shows a violation of rule 
> [S2111|[https://rules.sonarsource.com/java/type/Bug/RSPEC-2111]] - a 
> dangerous use of the BigDecimal constructor.
> Fixed by using BigDecimal.valueOf(param) instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to