[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17003600#comment-17003600
]
Gilles Sadowski commented on COLLECTIONS-728:
---------------------------------------------
{quote}we may have to agree to disagree on this one.
{quote}
Maybe, maybe not.
I'm not even there yet: My main problem is that (IIUC) this discussion (about
how to distinguish hash functions and how to check for Bloom filters
"compatibility"[1]) should be be postponed to _after_ committing the "main" (as
I see it, from my incomplete POV) functionality. Maybe we don't agree about
what should be "main" (or core).
If that's the case, please post to the "dev" ML; explain why we are stuck, and
that additional reviewers are needed.
[1] One could construe that such a check could be provided "externally", e.g.
(random thought):
{code:java}
public class BloomCompatibilityChecker {
/** Checks whethe the filters are comparable. */
public static boolean check(BloomFilter f, BloomFilter g) {
return ...;
}
/** Checks whether the filter is using some specific hash function. */
public static boolean isUsing(BloomFilter f, HashFunction h) {
return ...;
}
}
{code}
> BloomFilter contribution
> ------------------------
>
> Key: COLLECTIONS-728
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-728
> Project: Commons Collections
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Claude Warren
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: BF_Func.md, BloomFilter.java, BloomFilterI2.java,
> Usage.md
>
>
> Contribution of BloomFilter library comprising base implementation and gated
> collections.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
