[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-94?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17093897#comment-17093897
]
Gilles Sadowski commented on GEOMETRY-94:
-----------------------------------------
I would avoid "syntactic sugar" (i.e. keep only one API).
I was asking for an example because when looking at the code it seemed that
several factory methods used "{{this}}" as one of the arguments (?).
> ConvexSubPlane Subclasses
> -------------------------
>
> Key: GEOMETRY-94
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-94
> Project: Apache Commons Geometry
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Matt Juntunen
> Priority: Major
> Labels: beta1
>
> There should be specific subclasses of {{ConvexSubPlane}} to allow for
> optimization and ease of use.
> - {{OpenConvexSubPlane}} - extends {{ConvexSubPlane}}; represents a convex
> subplane that is open on a least one side and has infinite size
> - {{ClosedConvexSubPlane}} - extends {{ConvexSubPlane}}; represents a convex
> subplane with finite size; the 2D subspace is a polygon
> - {{Triangle3D}} - extends {{ClosedConvexSubPlane}}; represents a triangle
> in 3D space; most 3D models are or can easily be represented with triangles
> so it would be good to have a dedicated class for this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
