[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17184174#comment-17184174
 ] 

Gilles Sadowski commented on NUMBERS-149:
-----------------------------------------

bq. Maybe I shouldn't add the @Deprecated tag?

The code is the problem, not the annotation!

bq. adding a cache, which I think good,

This change is not innocuous at could be at odds with the design goals: 
{{Fraction}} is meant to be a 
[ValJO|https://blog.joda.org/2014/03/valjos-value-java-objects.html].  Thus 
requires discussion (on the "dev" ML).

This issue should only deal with ensuring that the concept of "fraction" is 
correctly implemented in [Numbers], trimming all the cruft (bloat and bugs) 
from the class in [Lang] but using it to double-check the implementation in 
[Numbers].

> port functions / tests in commons-lang for Fraction.
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUMBERS-149
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-149
>             Project: Commons Numbers
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fraction
>            Reporter: Jin Xu
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-numbers/pull/82



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to