[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jesse MacFadyen resolved CB-1291.
---------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Resolved where possible.
The Windows 8 version of the contacts.find API spawn a system dialog where the 
user must pick one or more contacts.  The contacts are returned to the cordova 
app with the same properties as the other platforms, where available.  Docs are 
updated to include #quirks.

> Windows 8 Contacts - Find+Create APIs
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CB-1291
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1291
>             Project: Apache Cordova
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Plugin Contacts, Windows 8
>            Reporter: Jesse MacFadyen
>            Assignee: Jesse MacFadyen
>
> It looks like we will need to approach Contacts on Windows 8 differently.
> The goal of the Contacts API is not to have every app become a 
> ContactProvider, which would result in chaos ... 
> Windows 8 does not have built in contacts, they are managed internally by the 
> People app.  The People app is a ContactProvider  so when you are performing 
> an operation that requires a contact, you are given the opportunity to select 
> one or more contacts from the People app, as well as every other app that 
> publishes the ContactProvider contract.
> Searching contacts cannot be achieved given Windows 8 APIs and interaction 
> with the People app, but the primary use case of picking one or more contacts 
> to interact with can work.
> I think the best approach would be to return a contact object as defined by 
> PhoneGap APIs, but allow the user to actually do the selection ( via the 
> picker )
> Here is a good write-up by a Microsoft evangelist about how contacts work on 
> Windows 8.
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/glengordon/archive/2012/08/28/windows-8-apps-for-the-phonegap-developer-contacts.aspx



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to