[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12603921#action_12603921
]
Guillaume Sauthier commented on CXF-1642:
-----------------------------------------
Great to know.
I've just seen that import statement in the pom.xml:
com.ctc.wstx*;resolution:=optional
I'm checking the 2.0.x-fixes MANIFEST to be sure that the import is really
there....
No luck, the import package is not there !!!
I've noticed that the import described with pattern (com.ctc.wstx* for example)
are not always turned into real import packages by Bnd.
In fact, this is understandable: Bnd looks for really used packages, and try to
match them using the patterns.
If no used packages match the import directive (the pattern), there will be no
real Import-Package in the MANIFEST.
This is what happen for CXF (or at least I suspect that), so, CXF should avoid
using a pattern for woodstox:
Import-Package com.ctc.wstx.sax;resolution:=optional, *
is probably better
BTW, here is what I see during bundlization:
[INFO] [bundle:bundle]
[WARNING] Warning building bundle
org.apache.cxf:cxf-bundle:bundle:2.0.7-SNAPSHOT : Instructions for
Export-Package that are never used:
org\.w3\._2006\._05\.addressing\.wsdl\..*|org\.w3\._2006\._05\.addressing\.wsdl,
org\.xmlsoap\.schemas\.wsdl\.http\..*|org\.xmlsoap\.schemas\.wsdl\.http,
=META-INF\.cxf
[WARNING] Warning building bundle
org.apache.cxf:cxf-bundle:bundle:2.0.7-SNAPSHOT : Superfluous export-package
instructions: [org.w3._2006._05.addressing.wsdl.*,
org.xmlsoap.schemas.wsdl.http.*]
[WARNING] Warning building bundle
org.apache.cxf:cxf-bundle:bundle:2.0.7-SNAPSHOT : Did not find matching referal
for com.ctc.wstx*
[WARNING] Warning building bundle
org.apache.cxf:cxf-bundle:bundle:2.0.7-SNAPSHOT : Did not find matching referal
for org.jaxen*
[ERROR] Error building bundle org.apache.cxf:cxf-bundle:bundle:2.0.7-SNAPSHOT :
Exporting packages that are not on the Bundle-Classpath[Jar:dot]: [META-INF.cxf]
See Did not find matching referal for com.ctc.wstx*, same for org.jaxen*
> CXF Bundle is missing an Import-Package for woodstox
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1642
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1642
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.1, 2.0.6
> Environment: Running CXF with cxf-bundle
> Reporter: Guillaume Sauthier
> Attachments: cxf-stacktrace.txt
>
>
> When running the cxf-bundle (2.0.6) in an OSGi environment (Felix), the Bus
> cannot initialize sucesfuly:
> 2008-06-10 14:54:27,350 : SpringBusFactory.createBus : Failed to create
> application context.
> org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanDefinitionStoreException: Unexpected
> exception parsing XML document from class path resource
> [META-INF/cxf/cxf.xml]; nested exception is
> javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: org.w3c.dom.DOMException:
> NAMESPACE_ERR: An attempt is made to create or change an object in a way
> which is incorrect with regard to namespaces.
> After a bit of digging, I've found that Xerces was used instead of Woodstox.
> This is caused by the TunedDocumentLoader:
> try {
> Class<?> cls =
> Class.forName("com.ctc.wstx.sax.WstxSAXParserFactory");
> saxParserFactory = (SAXParserFactory)cls.newInstance();
> nsasaxParserFactory = (SAXParserFactory)cls.newInstance();
> } catch (Exception e) {
> //woodstox not found, use any other Stax parser
> saxParserFactory = SAXParserFactory.newInstance();
> nsasaxParserFactory = SAXParserFactory.newInstance();
> }
> Indeed, the cxf-bundle do not import the 'com.ctc.wstx.sax' package, so we
> fall back in the Exception handling, and CXF uses the default
> SAXParserFactory, which is provided by Xerces.
> Just to be sure, I've added manually an Import-Package on 'com.ctc.wstx.sax',
> and provided woodstox as a bundle, and everythings works better !
> I've only tested that on 2.0.6, but I've checked the Import-Package of the
> cxf-bundle version 2.1 and there is still no import, so I guess the problem
> is there too.
> What I'm proposing is simply add an optional dependency on Woodstox, so that
> if it is available, it will be used.
> Import-Package com.ctc.wstx.sax:resolution:=optional, *
> BTW, I'm curious, how about normal users who are not using OSGi ? What happen
> if they remove the woodstox.jar ? Will they have the same behavior than me ?
> If so, CXF has a real dependency on woodstox, and it should not try to hide
> it using Class.forName ...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
