[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12608650#action_12608650
 ] 

naveen bhat commented on CXF-1669:
----------------------------------


If WSS4J is designed to behave that way then,it is impossible for me to 
transfer large attachments(around 1GB or so) with WS-Security features 
enabled.I will get heap space exception if i try to send large data.It means it 
is a shortcoming on the part of apache CXF.I have worked on glassfish ,it does 
allow me to send large attachments with WSS enabled.

Thanks for your comments Mr.Daniel Kulp.
Let me know if there is a work around.

> MTOM does not work when add WSS4J interceptors(UsernameToken and Timestamp)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-1669
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1669
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: WS-* Components
>    Affects Versions: 2.1
>         Environment: Windows Xp,
> JDK 1.5 update 11
> apache CXF 2.1 release
>            Reporter: naveen bhat
>   Original Estimate: 72h
>  Remaining Estimate: 72h
>
> I have wriitten an Apache CXF client with the following specification,
> 1. MTOM attachment enabled(implemented by refering 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/mtom.html link).
> 2. WS-Secuirty features namely, UsernameToken and Timestamp (implemented by 
> refering   http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/ws-security.html link)
> As per my observation, i see that the MTOM attachment gets inlined in the 
> soap body of request, when i enable either of  WS-Security 
> features(UsernameToken or Timestamp).But when i disable WSS4J interceptors i 
> see that client sends the data as MTOM attachment.
> I suspect  WSS4J interceptor is causing the problem.Kindly help me in this 
> regard.
> Note: I added WSS4J interceptors programmatically.
> Thanks in advance,
> Navin Bhat
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to