wsdl2java generates incorrect code when same element in request and reply
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CXF-2394
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-2394
Project: CXF
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Tooling
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
Environment: Maven version: 2.0.8
Java version: 1.5.0_17
Maven plugin "cxf-codegen-plugin" (version 2.1.4) with goal "wsdl2java".
Reporter: Valerie Vanler
I am working on a WSDL and related xsd files provided by a third party.
In this WSDL, the root element of the message matches with the name of the
operation.
So the Web service is recognized as "wrapper" web services style by Cxf (the
@SOAPBinding annotation
is not present so the "wrapper" default is taken)
I have created a simple wsdl/xsd to reproduce the problem I am facing.
In fact, the request and the response have both a <xs:element> with the same
name ("options" in my sample)
The problem is that the "options" sub-tree is different in the request and in
the response.
The generated code is as follows:
(extract)
public void addOptionRequest(
@WebParam(mode = WebParam.Mode.INOUT, name = "options", targetNamespace
= "http://xml.testvv.com/AddOptionReply_1_0";)
javax.xml.ws.Holder<com.testvv.xml.addoptionreply_1_0.AddOptionReply.Options>
options,
...
Where addOptionRequest is my "operation".
The problem is that the "options" generated is the one from the reply. So I am
not able to create my request
"options" to call my webservice.
Is this a bug or should I use a special option to have the webservices
recognized as "non-wrapper"
(if such an option exist, I haven't found it)
Is the bug fix in a newer version of Cxf?
Note: I have tried to rename the operation in the wsdl (in order to have a
different operation name than
the root element of the schema) and in this case, the following annotation
appears @SOAPBinding(parameterStyle = SOAPBinding.ParameterStyle.BARE)
and everything goes well.
The problem is that as the WSDL/XSD are provided by a third party, I should not
change them.
Any help would be great
Valerie
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
