[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Valeri updated CXF-3062:
------------------------------
Attachment: patched-req-resp-with-no-messageID-response.xml
patched-one-way-response.xml
patched-one-way-response.xml - This file is a capture of the partial response
returned from a one-way request. Note the addition of the relates to MAP with
the unspecified value.
patched-req-resp-with-no-messageID-response.xml - This file is a capture of a
fault generated by a request (req/resp MEP) without a Message ID MAP. Note the
addition of the relates to MAP with the unspecified value.
All other permutations of faults and MEPs remain unaltered. The patch 1)
always includes a relates to MAP in any response, and 2) enforces the message
ID MAP on the request message of a req/resp MEP.
Earlier versions of CXF may stumble on response messages that use the
unspecified value for the relates to MAP as the code did not address this value
as a possible value for the MAP.
> WS-A support does not enforce Message ID MAP for Req/Resp MEP
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-3062
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3062
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: WS-* Components
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0, 2.2.11
> Reporter: David Valeri
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: CXF-3062.patch, patched-one-way-response.xml,
> patched-req-resp-with-no-messageID-response.xml
>
>
> The WS-A SOAP Binding [1] does not lay out any specific requirements for the
> presence of Message Addressing Properties (MAPs) in the SOAP header.
> The WS-A WSDL Binding [2] does define required MAPs for certain WSDL MEPs
> [3]. The WSDL Binding requires a WS-A message ID property for a
> request-response MEP. A CXF client always sends a message ID when WS-A is in
> use, but the MAPAggregator isn't enforcing the presence of the message ID
> property on the server side. MAPAggregator currently looks at the message ID
> if alowDuplicates is turned off, but only looks if the value is non-null.
> The interceptors have access to the MEP and could enforce the presence of the
> property when in a request-reply MEP.
> Additionally, if the ID is missing, the fault for a request-response MEP
> should still carry a relationship MAP per the WS-A WSDL Binding requirements.
> It follows that "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/unspecified"; would be
> used as the message identifier IRI in this case [4].
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-soap/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-wsdl/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-wsdl/#WSDLMEPS
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core/#msgaddrprops
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
