[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966050#action_12966050
 ] 

Sergey Beryozkin commented on CXF-3160:
---------------------------------------

Hi Christian

there's definitely a lot of duplication between rt/transports/http and 
rt/transports/http_osgi. 
rt/transports/http_osgi needs to be refactored, I was actually trying to get 
rid of some duplications during the last couple of days, for the changes to 
make into 2.3.1, but I ended up seeing the demos I was working upon failing as 
a result so we'd need a bit more time :-)

I'd probably consider even removing it  altogether and may be adding an OSGI 
Activator to the http transport code, not sure yet how plausible it is...The 
biggest issue with the http_osgi is that it basically forces all the bundles to 
share the same context, ex, /cxf by default or say /services

cheers, Sergey

> Reduce Code duplication between http transport variants
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-3160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3160
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Transports
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>            Assignee: Christian Schneider
>         Attachments: CXF-3160-1.patch
>
>
> We still have to much duplicated or very similar code in the http transports. 
> Moving header code from AbstractHttpDestination to Headers
> Moving invokeDestination from ServletController to AbstractServletController 
> to share this code with http-osgi
> Moving invoke from ServletDestination to AbstractHttpDestination  to share 
> this code with http-osgi
> Removing doMessage from OsgiDestination
> Removing invokeDestination from OsgiServletcontroller
> Ignoring some mock based tests that do not work anymore. Will have to do some 
> work on them
> There are some small changes in the behaviour for http-osgi as we are now 
> using the servlet code here. It would be great if Sergey or Dan could review 
> this. Idon“t think the differences are important but I am not sure.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to