[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921929#action_12921929
]
Robert Liguori edited comment on CXF-3028 at 1/21/11 1:21 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I think there would be tremendous value-added if the TCK status is maintained
in relationship to all JSR's used or interfaced with. Also, a table (or
column) for compliancy of WS-* implementations would also be beneficial.
This information has two primary values. (1) Shows off compliancies that have
been reached. (2) Flags areas of code that need further refinement to reach
compliancies.
Given the explanations of how compliancies are performed and recorded, I think
that the project status page looks good in regards to how it's been recently
updated. No more changes relative to this issue are neccessary.
This issue can be closed.
was (Author: gliesian):
I think there would be tremendous value-added if the TCK status is
maintained in relationship to all JSR's used or interfaced with. Also, a table
(or column) for compliancy of WS-* implementations would also be beneficial.
This information has two primary values. (1) Shows off compliancies that have
been reached. (2) Flags areas of code that need further refinement to reach
compliancies.
> Update CXF Project Status Page
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-3028
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3028
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: Robert Liguori
> Priority: Minor
> Original Estimate: 2h
> Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> Please consider updating your project status page:
> http://cxf.apache.org/project-status.html.
> You can add many more rows into your tables gathered from the stack
> comparison page: http://wiki.apache.org/ws/StackComparison... and a few more
> tables too.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
