[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13174072#comment-13174072
]
Sergey Beryozkin edited comment on CXF-3988 at 12/21/11 1:04 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like a good idea indeed;
Something like
{code:java}
AttachmentBuilder {
AttachmentBuilder header(String name, Object value);
// shortcut for header ("Content-Disposition", cd)
AttachmentBuilder cd(ContentDisposition cd);
AttachmentBuilder data(InputStream is);
// etc
Attachment build();
}
{code}
guess something like that can be handy, it may take a bit of time to make it
complete, but I like the idea
was (Author: sergey_beryozkin):
Sounds like a good idea indeed;
Something like
AttachmentBuilder {
AttachmentBuilder header(String name, Object value);
// shortcut for header ("Content-Disposition", cd)
AttachmentBuilder cd(ContentDisposition cd);
AttachmentBuilder data(InputStream is);
// etc
Attachment build();
}
guess something like that can be handy, it may take a bit of time to make it
complete, but I like the idea
> org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.ext.multipart.Attachment object should be mutable
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-3988
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3988
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JAX-RS
> Affects Versions: 2.5.1
> Reporter: Benson Margulies
>
> As currently coded, the headers in an Attachment are immutable after
> construction. This prevents a construction like:
> - call a convenient constructor
> - add one more header
> Rather than change the contract of getHeaders, I propose to add put/putSingle
> to the contract of Attachment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
