[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13433344#comment-13433344
]
Aki Yoshida edited comment on CXF-4469 at 8/14/12 6:18 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Hi Colm,
Okay. Thanks.
I looked at manifest in the wss4j.1.6.6.jar bundle and I saw the org.opensaml*
stuff with optional resolution. So, I thought opensaml is still optional. But I
saw they are referenced in rt-ws-security's WSS4JInInterceptor, so they seem to
be required.
But I am still wondering if opensaml is declared as optional in wss4j 1.6.6,
some ws security functionality may be provided without opensaml?
Regards, Aki
was (Author: ay):
Hi Colm,
I might be missing something.
I looked at manifest in the wss4j.1.6.6.jar bundle, and I saw the org.opensaml*
stuff with optional resolution. So, I thought opensaml is still optional.
Regards, Aki
> 2.6.x rt-ws-security bundle is requiring opensaml
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-4469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4469
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: WS-* Components
> Affects Versions: 2.6.1
> Reporter: Aki Yoshida
> Assignee: Aki Yoshida
> Fix For: 2.6.2
>
>
> The CXF's 2.6.x's rt-ws-security bundle is requiring opensaml, although
> opensaml is supposed to be optional.
> The cxf all bundle declares opensaml* as optional and not requiring them.
> The rt-ws-security's pom also needs this optional import declaration.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
