[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Colm O hEigeartaigh updated CXF-5048:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.6.11
2.7.8
> StaticSTSProperties class requires a CXF message context to initialize using
> configure() method
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-5048
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5048
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.7.3
> Environment: OSX, Karaf 2.2.9, CXF 2.7.3, Camel 2.10.2, Jetty
> 7.6.7.v20120910, Karaf-Jetty 7.5.4.v20111024
> Reporter: Dario Amiri
> Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Fix For: 2.7.8, 2.6.11
>
>
> On May 29, 2013, at 12:47 PM, geecxf <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > While experimenting with the STS code I discovered that
> > configureProperties()
> > method of the StaticSTSProperties class requires a CXF message context in
> > order to execute successfully.
> >
> > This seems a little strange to me because as far as I understand the
> > properties are set once and there is nothing about them is related to the
> > request context. The way it is implemented now you basically have to wait
> > until the service is invoked before you can initialize the properties. Is
> > there a reason why it was implemented this way?
> >
> > I ask because it just doesn't seem right. I would expect to be able to call
> > configureProperties() at some point in time before the service was invoked.
> ... [show rest of quote]
> This definitely looks like a bug. In there, if the various properties
> objects are String's, then we end up doing:
> Bus bus = PhaseInterceptorChain.getCurrentMessage().getExchange().getBus();
> ResourceManager rm = bus.getExtension(ResourceManager.class);
> to get a ResourceManager to try and resolve those. Most likely, we should
> do:
> 1) Allow setting a Bus object on the properties so that the actual bus used
> is settable.
> 2) If bus is null, call BusFactory.getThreadDefaultBus() instead.
> Please log a bug.
> Dan
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)