[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sergey Beryozkin resolved CXF-5656.
-----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.7.11
                   3.0.0
         Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin

> ContentType is removed for InternalServerError and doesn't seem to be a way 
> to set a charset
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-5656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5656
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JAX-RS
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.7, 2.7.10
>            Reporter: Andy Kane
>            Assignee: Sergey Beryozkin
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.7.11
>
>
> We have a Rest service that uses JAX-RS and CXF.  When we used CXF 2.3.3, if 
> there was a problem with the request and a non 200 status code was returned, 
> the browser would display the message from the response with any encoded non 
> ASCII characters as the ContentType returned application/json;charset=utf-8.  
> After upgrading to 2.7.7, we noticed that non ASCII characters where not 
> being encoded for Status 500 - Internal Server Error.  This doesn't happen 
> for any other status codes and we noticed that charset=utf-8 was being 
> stripped from the ContentType.  After looking through the CXF code, I noticed 
> that the AbstractHTTPDestination class was removing the ContentType (line 
> 553).  The ContentType was then re-added in getContentTypeFromMessage method 
> in the headers object without the Charset.  Looking at this method, I noticed 
> that the encoding was taken from Message.ENCODING and in our case this was 
> null.  
> There doesn't seem to be a way of setting 
> org.apache.cxf.message.Message.ENCODING from either the ExceptionMapper or 
> ExceptionMapper.  I have also set the encoding type in the Response object in 
> ExceptionMapper, but this doesn't seem to make much difference either. 
> Removing the ContentType seems like a bug, as if the ContentType has been 
> previously set and then this should be preserved.  Is there a work around for 
> this problem in the mean time. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to